Paquet «Politique européenne de voisinage»
Opinion factsheet
Sur cette page
- Relations extérieures, élargissement et politique de voisinage
- Partenariat oriental
- Partenariat euro-méditerranéen
Opinion number:
CDR-4459-2014
Status:
Adoptés
Objective
Underline the necessity to support the local and regional dimension of the new European Neighbourhood Policy in order to extend the governmental cooperation since it would help bring citizens closer to a dialogue between EU and partner countries and involve new actors into the policy.
Invite to better highlight the role of the local and regional authorities and the importance of multi-level governance in achieving the goal of "deep democracy". Local and Regional authorities are not only implementing but are also important drivers of change in the ENP countries and many of them have original decentralised structures whereby the national level was linked to the Soviet regime.
Stress the need to promote strong and democratic governance at the sub-national level and focus the attention on the issues of local democracy in partner countries and problems of regional authorities.
Stress the importance of decentralisation, especially fiscal decentralisation and the respect of the Charter for Local Self-Government and capacity building on the local level to go through with the necessary reforms.
Highlight the fact that the CoR is the only EU body observing the local and regional elections in the ENP countries.
Reflect the strong commitment of the CoR in developing the local and regional aspect of the European Neighbourhood policy as demonstrated by the creation of ARLEM and CORLEAP and report on important strategic decisions and directions these bodies have taken and which would need to be responded to by the European Commission and other European institutions.
Highlight that the present communication lacks far behind the communications of 2011 and 2012 as there is no reference to the sub-national level at all and that this should be taken in consideration in the future having in consideration the involvement and the successful common activities of LRA from EU and ENP in this policy area and implementation process.
Reiterate that LRAs can work through the CoR’s engagement in the first thematic platform of the multilateral track of the EaP (on “democracy, good governance and stability”) as the primary means by which to showcase strategic management reform as a marker of enhanced local and regional governance capability.
Reiterate that CoR can lobby EU actors, starting with the European Commission to review the requirements to apply for EU financial assistance.
Reiterate that CoR can work closely with the European Commission competent services to identify ways in which the process of applying for EU financial assistance can be made easier for LRAs in the ENP countries.
Reiterate the importance of a coordinated bottom-up approach also in the field of the Neighbourhood policy and to support cooperation between the local and regional authorities from partner countries and the EU.
Request to develop suitable mechanisms to encourage direct dialogue, information exchange and know-how transfer also for the regional and local level in the partner countries (such as existing in the form of the Local Administration Facility in the Enlargement countries). Twinning and TAIEX are two instruments that have been widely deployed by the EU to bring partner countries closer to the EU and must be extended to the sub national level of government.
Invite to better highlight the role of the local and regional authorities and the importance of multi-level governance in achieving the goal of "deep democracy". Local and Regional authorities are not only implementing but are also important drivers of change in the ENP countries and many of them have original decentralised structures whereby the national level was linked to the Soviet regime.
Stress the need to promote strong and democratic governance at the sub-national level and focus the attention on the issues of local democracy in partner countries and problems of regional authorities.
Stress the importance of decentralisation, especially fiscal decentralisation and the respect of the Charter for Local Self-Government and capacity building on the local level to go through with the necessary reforms.
Highlight the fact that the CoR is the only EU body observing the local and regional elections in the ENP countries.
Reflect the strong commitment of the CoR in developing the local and regional aspect of the European Neighbourhood policy as demonstrated by the creation of ARLEM and CORLEAP and report on important strategic decisions and directions these bodies have taken and which would need to be responded to by the European Commission and other European institutions.
Highlight that the present communication lacks far behind the communications of 2011 and 2012 as there is no reference to the sub-national level at all and that this should be taken in consideration in the future having in consideration the involvement and the successful common activities of LRA from EU and ENP in this policy area and implementation process.
Reiterate that LRAs can work through the CoR’s engagement in the first thematic platform of the multilateral track of the EaP (on “democracy, good governance and stability”) as the primary means by which to showcase strategic management reform as a marker of enhanced local and regional governance capability.
Reiterate that CoR can lobby EU actors, starting with the European Commission to review the requirements to apply for EU financial assistance.
Reiterate that CoR can work closely with the European Commission competent services to identify ways in which the process of applying for EU financial assistance can be made easier for LRAs in the ENP countries.
Reiterate the importance of a coordinated bottom-up approach also in the field of the Neighbourhood policy and to support cooperation between the local and regional authorities from partner countries and the EU.
Request to develop suitable mechanisms to encourage direct dialogue, information exchange and know-how transfer also for the regional and local level in the partner countries (such as existing in the form of the Local Administration Facility in the Enlargement countries). Twinning and TAIEX are two instruments that have been widely deployed by the EU to bring partner countries closer to the EU and must be extended to the sub national level of government.
Essential points
THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
– would like to emphasise the importance of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) as an EU external policy instrument targeted at countries situated to the south and east of the EU, with a view to achieving closer relations between these countries and the EU;
– stresses the comprehensive and multilevel nature of ENP relations and the policy's multilevel governance. In view of this, support is needed for the ENP's regional and local dimension complementing cooperation at the level of national governments;
– emphasises the importance of two initiatives, i.e. the Eastern Partnership and the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM). These are regional dimensions of the ENP, and are not just thematic aspects of EU policy, but also reflect EU Member State foreign policy priorities at central, regional and local level;
– would like subnational governance levels to participate more actively and be more closely involved in the process of ENP implementation. The Committee of the Regions' strong commitment to the local and regional aspect of the ENP is reflected in its establishment of two platforms for dialogue and cooperation operating in parallel, i.e. the Euro-Mediterranean Local and Regional Assembly (ARLEM) and the Conference of Regional and Local Authorities for the Eastern Partnership (CORLEAP);
– appreciates the European Union's efforts to support constitutional and economic reform processes through appropriate financial and technical support for ENP beneficiary countries; however, these efforts require further simplification and organisation. Increased EU support for neighbouring countries should be conditional on the progress of constitutional changes, democratisation and respect for the rule of law;
– points out that that the regional and local level has a fundamental role to play in properly forecasting, planning, implementing and monitoring support programmes and instruments; also argues that local and regional authorities (LRAs) should have easier access to funding, and that the associated mechanisms and procedures are in need of simplification.