Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes

Opinion factsheet

Conteúdo desta página

  • Enterprise and Industry
  • Research and intellectual property

Relator
Opinion number:
CDR-0230-2010
Status:
Adotados
Descarregar

Objective

Contribute to the debate launched by the Communication on the simplification of the implementation of the research framework programmes.

Impact

The opinion on "Simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes" contributed to the debate launched by the Communication on the simplification of the implementation of the research framework programmes. The report adopted by the Parliament also mentions "the involvement of regional and local authorities as crucial in enhancing the research and innovation capacity of their region".

Essential points

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

- welcomes the intention to facilitate the interinstitutional debate on the administrative and financial simplification of the programme rules;

- notes that complexity is itself a major source of error or anomaly;

- acknowledges the importance of distinguishing between error and fraud, and of fostering a culture of integrity and trust;

- supports the approach suggested by the European Parliament for a "science and technology" or "science and innovation" based approach , rooted in sound scientific/technical quality criteria; relying on realistic management practices; acknowledging the commonalities and differences between science, technology development and market diffusion;

- stresses that effectiveness should be judged not just on the achievement of excellence in research activities, but also on the building of research capacities and absorption potential across all territories of the EU in line with the principle of territorial cohesion;

- appreciates the Research Potential of Convergence Regions programme in the Capacities Programme;

- suggests that the next Framework Programme further expands such programmes and incorporates a scheme for mainstreaming the participation of competent partners from research-lagging regions in projects and programmes led by their better known, excellent peers, through mentoring schemes or other means; notes, in this regard, the potential of local and regional actors to nurture ‘hubs of competence’ linked to "poles of excellence";